Showing posts with label Social Media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social Media. Show all posts

Friday, September 27, 2013

Original posts are editable on Facebook now!!

Check it out, in case you haven't heard/read yet!!

We can edit our original posts/status updates on Facebook now!!


Even George Takei posted about it:



Pete Pachal wrote about it on Mashable yesterday, with different news for Android and iOS users:
The editing feature will roll out to Facebook users on the web and Android devices over the next day, Facebook confirmed to Mashable. The editing feature is not included in the latest iOS app, but will likely get pushed out in the next update. Users will see the option to "Edit Post" when they click on the drop-down arrow in the top-right corner of a post.
You can read the rest of the article here. Or see more news about it via this google search for "Facebook edit posts".

As you can see, all you have to do is click on the drop down menu in the upper right hand corner of your post, and now "Edit Post" has been added to your "Delete" & "Embed Post" options.

I'm sure this'll be of particular relief to all the grammar and word nazis who occasionally slip up with their own posts!! Just thought I'd share. TGIF!! :-D

Monday, July 01, 2013

Federal Furlough Fun on Facebook

Hey there,

So I realize some of you might be thinking what could possibly be fun about being affected by the Federal Furlough.

Well, one person decided that one way would be to start a Facebook group called "How I Spent My Furlough Day".



It's an open group, and this is part of what it's about:
This group was created to share stories, photos and reflections about how we spend our furlough days. It is a deliberate effort to bring a little laughter and levity to an otherwise difficult situation.
There's even an event on Monday, July 8th, the Federal Furlough Five Mile Fun Run for Freedom.


If you're around (and affected), definitely click on the link to RSVP on Facebook. And keep an eye out for any of your friends who might be affected, as there are a number of profile pics which were created and share to spread the word about the group and the event.

So check out and let me know what you think in the comments. Especially let me know if you plan on joining the group and even participating in the run. Would love to hear your story.

And if you have any other comments, even if just about the group in general (for better or for worse), please share.

- JR

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Facebook photo upload issues

Hey there,

Encountering issues uploading photos on Facebook? Does this error message look familiar?


Storage Failure
We had trouble storing this photo, please try
again in a few minutes.

Well you're not the only one. Check out this question posted at the Help Center. Just posted a little after 11am EST, it's already got well over a hundred sympathetic "answers" from people experiencing the same issue.

Is this affecting you? Is it not? Did it, but now it's fine? Please share, in the comments.

Curious mind wants to know,

JR

Thursday, April 04, 2013

"You are the Social Media You're Using"...yeah

Hey there,

Just another infographic of the day. I know, I haven't gotten in the habit of doing this daily. But nevertheless, I saw this and had to share.



What do you think? What does the social media you're using say about you? Was this pretty accurate, or completely off the mark? Is reality somewhere in the middle?

Let me know in the comments,

JR

Monday, April 01, 2013

Facebook fallout from unfriending

Hey there,

So...I've received my first threat from unfriending someone on Facebook. No joke, this was one of their last messages to me.
"It's "just Facebook" but you took time out of your day to "punish" me for liking something on your wall. Actions have consequences in this small town. Toodles!"
Up on his wall, barely hours after?

People do things on Facebook that they would never do if they had to "Face" the person they're doing it to IRL (in real life). It's called Facerage, and it can get you thrown in jail.
 And:
...I've misbehaved a lot on here, everyone knows that. And I will take my lumps. But I will also put the boot to the face of anyone who defriends me for no good reason. Shall I name names?
So I guess these were the consequences, because guess what? Not only did he name me, but there were 6 others he named. Honestly, it was actually kind of reaffirming to know I wasn't the only one. Was I worried that he called me out? Not really.

It's funny, Mashable just had an article in March titled 5 Alternatives to Unfriending Someone on Facebook which said this at on point:
Facebook unfriending can be awkward or taken personally, often making it more trouble than it's worth.
I've been on both sides of it, and everyone has their reason. I personally thought I had a good one, in that I had gotten into a heated Facebook exchange with another friend, and through it all, the ex-friend Liked one of their comments, and none of mine. Not that I took it personally, but it was just indicative of a general mentally and mindset represented in the particular comment that I honestly don't need or want in my life.

But from said person's point of view, I was "punishing" them for liking something on my wall, which was a fairly oversimplified statement of the situation. The reality was more nuanced and complex.

And not only that, there were 6 people OTHER THAN ME. I'd think most people would take multiple..."unfriendings" as a sign that maybe it's not OTHER people that are the problem, if there's any problem at all, to begin with.

Sometimes people also just go different ways. And we all have different barometers. One I loved, which a friend shared, was this:
"The defriending is usually when the answer to the question "would I stop on the street and say hi to this person" is no."
 So there it is. I can see what Mashable was saying, but honestly, this reaction just confirmed that this was not someone I probably wanted to be friends with in the first place.

And I even said so in my own Facebook post, although I did not name names. Because what does that accomplish? Trying to get people to choose sides? All I know is that if someone every puts me in that position, I tend to favor the party that didn't try to make me pick. Which is exactly what I wouldn't want any of our mutual friends to have to do.

That's that. Any thoughts? Questions? Stories of your own? Please share in the comments, below,

JR

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Twitter Tuesday: Ten more tweeps to follow

Hey there,

So here's the 2nd post in this series I started last week, Twitter Tuesday: Ten tweeps to follow.
And here are ten more, the next ten who were among the first to follow me back.

Now, the only thing is I can't embed those who've protected their tweets. Makes sense, right?

That being said, this list isn't comprehensive. But I appreciate and respect my friends who've made that choice regarding their personal privacy settings. In the meantime, here are the ones that I can share
  1. Tracy Wertheimer - I am a Lighting Designer for theatre, dance, events, and anything else that gets thrown my way.
    Currently in New York, NY
  2. Cara Fleck - every day harpenings in 140 characters.
  3. Buffyfest - We love Joss Whedon shows Buffy, Angel, Firefly, Dr Horrible and Dollhouse. News about Sarah Michelle Gellar, David Boreanaz, James Marsters, Eliza Dushku.
    NYC/LA - Buffyfest@aim.com
  4. Shukoor Ahmed -  An Entreprenuer, Politico, Philatelist, Avid Networker. Serves as the CEO of V-Empower, Inc and Founder of www.SendwithMe.com & www.Ridetheway.com
    Washington DC
  5. Mark Warner - Updates from the U.S. Senator from Virginia and Staff. Following/retweeting does not equal an endorsement.
    Virginia
  6. Bil Browning - LGBT blogger and activist This is my personal account; if you're looking for the blog tweets follow @bilericoproject
    Washington, DC
  7. Shawna Thomas - @NBCNews White House Producer (Links & retweets aren't endorsements. Opinions are my own. JFGI. TV isn't magic. Duh.)
    Washington, DC
  8. The Bilerico Project - The official Bilerico Project twitter account
    United States
  9. Sarah Anne - Living in Baltimore. @Dance_Exchange board member
    Baltimore, MD
  10. Steve Love - the little one from Mars.
    Chicago, IL
And that's it.

I wonder who the next ten are!!

JR

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

My Top Tweeps according to Klout

Hey there,

These are my top tweeps.

This'll be oversimplified, but according to two simple paramaters: Klout and Tweeps I know IRL, these are my top Twitter Friends which I've met and know in real life:
  • Regina Holliday, I believe I met her at my first ever un-conference. She does wonderful work, as an artist, promoting patient rights within medicine. I recommend checking out her blog as well as following her on Twitter.
  • Farra Trompeter, I met at a workshop at the Foundation Center here in DC. She's VP at Big Duck, "smart communications for nonprofits".
  • Tom Goss, I actually met while sitting on a panel at the DC Commission on the Arts & Humanities. And since then, I can't seem to stop running into him, as his music stands at the intersection of LGBT equality and arts.
  • Shawna, I met when I was a frehshman at GWU, fall of '99, and now she's a frickin' White House Producer at NBC News. And she's still down-to-earth-enough to connect with people like me on social media (luv ya)!!
And that actually is a pretty great reflection of my own way of life, an intersection of the arts, sex & sexuality, news, politics...and stuff.

Yeah, out of all of the people I follow on Twitter, if you were to follow any, follow these five. Because they're doing it right...whatever "it" is. :-D

Also, if you use Chrome, here's the Klout plug-in.

That is all,

JR

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Twitter Tuesday: Ten tweeps to follow

Hey there,

As i get closer to 2000 followers, I thought I'd start paying homage by highlighting ten tweeps a week, in order of those who followed me.

So here are the first 10, with their bios at the time of this posting, followed by their profile embedded into this blog:
  1. John Dellaporta - Actor, TV reviewer for DC Theatre Scene , fan of short-lived quirky TV shows, Apple fanboy. All views are mine alone.
    Washington, DC
  2. Liam Mulshine - Forged in the heart of a star. Sunburns easily.
    Los Angeles, CA
  3. Oscar Rohena - I'm @oscar! dot com. Work @ #Hulu #STS135 #Gaymer
    Los Angeles, CA
  4. Barack Obama - This account is run by Organizing for Action staff. Tweets from the President are signed -bo.
    Washington, DC
  5. NPR News - News. Arts & Life. Music. Everything and more from NPR.
    Washington, DC
  6. Stephen - Environmental advocate from the DC area.
    Washington, DC
  7. Nigel Sanders - Print Samurai, Ninja Illustrator, Visual Ronin, and Media Anthrpologist.
    El Aye, See Aye, All Day
  8. Aris Kyriakopoulos - Aspiring comm/PR pro. @smcdc digital team. Gaytheist. @GWalumni. Democrat. DC native+nomad. I'm told I sound exactly like my tweets. Opinions my own.
  9. kkmayfield - I dance, write, think, and play.
    metro dc
  10. Diana Wei Fang - Music & Arts Coordinator @ National Community Church | Learning how to love unconditionally
    Washington, DC

    So a big thanks to you guys and gals and organizations for joining me in this crazy social media adventure!!

    And looking forward to highlighting the next ten tweeps who followed me back when my account was still a wee little Twitter egg,

    JR

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Getting to know my YouTube One Channel

Hey there,

Today I took advantage of YouTube's new One Channel layout and format. And it's pretty slick.

If you go to the page, it starts off with this:
You are more than the sum of your uploads. On your new channel, branding works across devices, you can reach out to non-subscribed viewers, and you can show off more of your content so fans will go deeper.
When you opt in to begin the process, YouTube walks you through the new features with the quintessential tour. It starts off with an explanation about how the new features has been optimized to make it easier for subscribers to engage with your content.


One way they do that is by adding sections.


Sections can be organized by uploads or likes, or even playlists or tags. They start you off with some examples from your own content.


Next, they give you a handy-dandy checklist, for setting up your new channel: setting your channel icon, adding channel art, describing your channel, adding web links, adding a section, and last but not least (and one I need to do) adding a channel trailer.


A channel trailer is a clip that will be shown exclusively to viewers who have NOT subscribed to your channel yet. Not only that, it will always autoplay.

Next up in terms of the walk-through is choosing your channel art. They mention that this will not only show on the usual suspects in terms of desktops and laptops, but mobile devices and TVs as well.


And I LOVE that they mention from the get go that "recommended channel art size is 2120 x 1192", instead of waiting until after you try loading it, or just not mentioning it at all.


 Finally, they give you a preview of how your channel art will appear across different devices.


Anyway, that's that. Just thought I'd give a quick walk-through for anyone else who might be curious, but not ready to make the transition yet.

One more thing I'll leave you with, is recommending that you check out YouTube's Channel Optimization section. Definitely a must-read.

Have you made the leap? What do you think? Would also love to see what you've done with your channel. Please leave a link to your own channel in the comments!!

JR

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

3 reasons to always mention on Twitter


Hey there,

So I understand why people don't always mention other people, entities, organizations etc. that appear in their tweets. It involves an extra bit of Twesearch if you're not already connected to them, to see if they are on Twitter and what their handle is. And for others, maybe it's just not even something that they're familiar with.

But for those ready to take the leap, that little bit of time and energy, to make sure you always mention anyone or anything you tweet about is definitely a great example of the Rule of Three at work in social media, in terms of what you put out, you get in return three-fold. So here it goes

When you mention someone:

  1. They will be notified that they've been mentioned in a tweet (maybe even by email, depending on their notification settings), and will see yours when they go to their Interactions or Mentions page. This is particularly good if it's someone you actually have a personal or professional relationship with, as they are that more likely to engage with your content and/or even share it. And because of just how much content is shared at any given moment, and most people don't spend their lives on Twitter, mentioning someone is just the thing to help put your content above the noise and make sure at least they see your tweet, instead of hoping that they're following you and happen to be on Twitter at the same time and...well you get the picture.
  2. Next, mentioning another Tweep creates a link in your Tweet...yeah I'm talking about code, which you normally don't really have to know or think about. But you should at least be aware of it here. This link is good because of SEO, as long as your links aren't spammy. Case in point, when I Google my handle AWayofLife0 (which I use almost consistently across platforms), making sure to hide my personal results, my Twitter pops up above my Blogspot, my YouTube, etc. Now, I'm not saying that mentions are the ONLY reason it shows up first, but it's definitely a large part of it.
  3. Finally, when you mention someone, you give your followers a chance to become engaged with that person as well, for better or for worse. In social media, as with all things online, it becomes a matter of the path of least resistance. And I would wager that seeing the handle of someone is more likely to inspire a response, than if you just typed the name out, particularly because it is visually different with aforementioned hyperlink capabilities.
So there you go. All of this is just to back up another point I sincerely believe in, in terms of not auto-syncing social media platforms. While there are exceptions, I would say that Facebook and Twitter are not one of  them.

Check out this post of mine from last year, if you're interested. But because each platform has its own mechanics, while some people might think they're saving time if their Facbeook content automatically shows up on Twitter, you miss out on the benefits of actually using Twitter to the best of its capacity, with mentions being a huge part of that.

Not a social media sermon, just a twitter thought.

Let me know what you think in the comments,

JR


Wednesday, March 06, 2013

Personal branding and photos on social media

Hey there,

One thing I spend a lot of time overanalyzing is personal branding. Yes, I'm sure it's nothing out of the ordinary for most people with a serious social media affliction.

But I also think about this as I strive to become a thought leader in my fields, as well as continue to build my public identity as a professional, self-employed artist, which I'd like to think isn't too far off from my personal and private identity. In fact, I strive for them to be as synchronized as possible, if not one and the same.

So with my latest photo update, it's probably the first time in a while I've consciously chosen photos to consistently use on my three main social networks, Facebook, Twitter, and Google+. The one outlier is the theme option in customizing one's Twitter design, but that'll be a post for another day.

Just wanted to share what I ended up with.

First up, we've got my Facebook profile.


Next on deck, is my Twitter. Haha, no pun intended given the recent news with TweetDeck.


Finally, we've got my profile on Google+.


You might've noticed the group profile photo on Facebook versus the solo version on the other two. This is mainly because Facebook is exclusively where I'm friends with people I know in person, so it just made sense for me to keep 'em in the shot, as well as tag them, whereas the other two platforms are more public.

I know, this might be a bit of an artificial distinction for some, but I mentioned I overanalyze things, and it's just what makes sense to me. I will say, I love how the cover photo works and plays with the different layouts, particularly Facebook & Google+ versus Twitter.

At the end of the day, though, this is a choice. Some might find it more useful to really customize the photos used depending on each platform's layout and dimensions. And I'm sure it's something I myself will explore sometime, when I have time to.

In the meantime, would love to hear how others address this, whether you use the same images or differentiate it based on the platform. Or even if you just don't think about it that much.

And please, feel free to leave links to your own profiles in the comments, if you'd like to share your personal examples, whether your own photo use is consistent, customized, or somewhere in between,

JR

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

What do Gollum, Morgan Freeman, & Ian McKellen have in common?

They've all been impersonated by white guys on YouTube...news to me, because I APPARENTLY don't watch YouTube as much as I thought I did.

So I was hanging out with my fellow gaymers during our weekly game night, and during one of our gaming breaks, we venture to YouTube for some brief entertainment.

So first it started when someone referred to a link they had posted on their Facebook wall earlier today. I wasn't ready for the miserable Gollum, singing about a dreamed he dreamed.


His facial expressions are just icing on this geeky, fantasy/musical cake.

Then somehow this was a transition to a guy who "supposedly" did a kick-ass Morgan Freeman impression. And all i could make of it was "titty sprinkles". Yeah, this one's note safe for work.



Yeah, wasn't ready for that one either.

And this holy Youtube trinity was rounded up by a guy who not only did a great Ian McKellen voice, but did a dramatic..."reading" of Baby Got Back.


DEFINITELY wasn't ready for that.

So there. Just thought I'd share. Any YouTube videos of celebrity (real or fictional) impersonations saying, reading, or singing something that's completely random?

Let me know in the comments,

JR

A MD Arts Day Tweet Cheat Sheet - when politics, social media & the arts collide

Hey there,

So I decided to post this up on my personal blog, because it was a nice intersection of several topics that are of particular interest to me.  I'm going to Maryland Arts Day for the third year in a row, representing Class Acts Arts.

And I wanted to make myself a Twitter cheat sheet, at least of all the people and organizations mentioned in the formal program, as well as whichever delegates I could find on Twitter (after two or so hours...).

Would have loved to do one of all the delegates attending and organizations represented, but I'm sure we'll find each other tomorrow. Maybe next year, I can get access to a attendee list ahead in time enough to to so. And if missed anyone, I apologize. This is certainly not a comprehensive list.

But I digress, here it is, complete with hyperlinks!!

You may also view or download the PDF at Google Drive.



Maryland Arts Day 2013 Tweet Cheat Sheet

Americans for the Arts - @americans4arts
Maryland Citizens for the Arts - @ArtsAdvocate_MD
Maryland State Arts Council - @marylandarts
Susquehanna - @susquehannabank, Lead Sponsor
Veteran Artist Program - @VetArtistProg, A New Partnership
Governor Martin O’Malley - @GovernorOMalley

Program
Clarice Smith Center - @claricesmithctr, ED Susan Farr is the ‘13 Sue Hess MD Arts Advocate of the Year
Lt. Governor Anthony G. Brown - @ltgovbrown
Strathmore - @strathmore, Performer Matt Wigler was an Artist-inResidence in 2010
Manhattan School of Music - @MSMPresents, Performer Matt Wigler is a current student

Delegates on Twitter (some not as active as most)

District 2B (Washington County)
Neil Parrott - @neilparrott

District 3A (Frederick County)
Patrick Hogan - @PatrickNHogan

District 3B (Frederick & Washington County)
Michael Hough - @houghdelegate

District 4A (Frederick County)
Kathy Afzali - @Kathy_Afzali
Kelly Schulz - @KellySchulz

District 5A (Carroll County)
Justin Ready - @JustinReady

District 5B (Baltimore County)
Wade Kach - @WadeKach

District 6 (Baltimore County)
John Olszewski, Jr. - @JohnnyOJr

District 7 (Baltimore & Harford Counties)
Pat McDonough - @Pat_McDonough
Kathy Szeliga - @MarylandKathy

District 9a (Howard County)
Gail H. Bates - @BatesGail
Warren Miller - @delwarmill

District 11 (Baltimore County)
Jon Cardin - @JonCardin
Dan Morhaim - @DanMorhaim

District 13 (Howard County)
Guy Guzzone - @GuyGuzzone

District 14 (Montgomery County)
Anne R. Kaiser - @DelegateKaiser
Eric Luedtke - @EricLuedtke
Craig Zucker - @DelegateZucker

District 15 (Montgomery County)
Aruna Miller - @arunamiller

District 16 (Montgomery County)
Bill Frick - @billfrick
Ariana Kelly - @DelArianaKelly

District 17 (Montgomery County)
Kumar Barve - @KumarBarve

District 18 (Montgomery County)
Al Carr - @alfredcarr
Ana Sol Gutierrez - @asolg
Jeff Waldstreicher - @jwaldstreicher

District 19 (Montgomery County)
Sam Arora - @sam_arora
Bonnie Cullison - @Del_Cullison

District 20 (Montgomery County)
Tom Hucker - @tomhucker
Heather R. Mizeur - @heathermizeur

District 21 (Anne Arundel & Prince George’s Counties)
Barnara Frush - @delegate61hotma

District 22 (Prince George’s County)
Alonzo T. Washington - @DelegateATW

District 23B (Prince George’s County)
Marvin E. Holmes Jr. - @MarvinEHolmesJr

District 30 (Anne Arundel County)
Herb McMillan - @herbmcmillan

District 31 (Anne Arundel County)
Don Dwyer - @DelegateDwyer
Nic Kipke - @Kipke

District 32 (Anne Arundel County)
Pamela Beidle - @beidlep1

District 33A (Anne Arundel County)
Tony McConkey - @McConkey

District 35A (Harford County)
H Wayne Norman - @DelegateNorman
Donna Stifler - @DonnaStifler

District 36 (Caroline, Cecil, Kent & Queen Counties)
Mike Smigiel - @MikeSmigiel

District 37B (Caroline, Dorchester, Talbot & Wicomico Counties)
Jeannie Haddaway-Riccio - @jeannie_riccio

District 39 (Montgomery County)
Kirill Reznik - @DelegateReznik
A. Shane Robinson - @DelSRobinson

District 40 (Baltimore City)
Shawn Z. Tarrant – @DelegateTarrant

District 41 (Baltimore City)
Jill P Carter - @jillpcarter
Sandy Rosenberg - @delsandy

District 42 (Baltimore County)
Susan Aumann - @Susanaumann

District 43 (Baltimore City)
Maggie McIntosh - @DelMaggie43
Mary Washington, PhD - @DelMaryW

District 44 (Baltimore City)
Keiffer Mitchell - @KeifferMitchell

District 46 (Baltimore City)
Luke Clippinger - @lukeclippinger

District 47 (Prince George’s County)
Jolene Ivey - @joleneivey

Please bookmark and share with anyone else interested,

JR

Monday, February 18, 2013

My four social media pillars


Hey there,

So I thought I'd share what have become the four pillars supporting my social media philosophy. And by no means are these necessarily original. As any other good college graduate, this is a synthesis of ideas that have made sense and been useful to me. All combined and distilled, these are the four things which form the support of my social media philosophy, regarding its professional use and how I apply me time and energy, when assisting and managing social media with the organizations I'm involved with.

Coordination - "the harmonious functioning of parts for effective results"

So while this might not be as much of an issue with small organizations (with a staff of one or so) or large ones, I think that this might actually be one of the biggest challenges for mid-size organizations. Coordination with social media is referring to coordination on all levels, with content, with programming, with existing messaging, etc.

It speaks to social media not happening in a vacuum, like some red-headed step child of a company. It means that at least those in leadership knows what is happening with social media, and that whoever is managing social media, is working in conjunction with other departments. One great way to start, which I will actually be doing as part of my work on a newly formed Communications & Media committee with SpeakeasyDC, is share an editorial calendar with the Social Media person, or start one that is at least shared by all department heads.

Finally, I like the last part of the definition, about "effective results". It's one thing to throw stuff against the wall and see what sticks. It's another to not just analyze what sticks to do more of it, but to tie in stuff that works with the goals of other departments, more donations with development, ticket sales production, brand recognition with marketing, etc, and what measurements will inform them about successful efforts.

Integration - "the act of combining or adding parts to make a unified whole"

Yes, some of you might be saying that integration and coordination are sometimes used synonymously, but for the purpose of these pillars, I'm focusing on the definitions that are different enough to address separate aspects.

Where coordination might speak to the actual management of social media and how it connects with the rest of the organization, integration speaks to it holistically, in terms of something that needs to be a part of every aspect of a company. Not only that, it needs to be consistent with branding guidelines, so that regardless of what channel you reach your audience, to them it aesthetically feels like it's coming from the same place, in look, in tone, etc. Actually about to go through a rebranding process with an organization I'm involved with, and you can be sure I will be reminding them about the implications and usability for our social media presence.

It's also not a matter of if social media is useful for any particular aspect of an organization's work on any level, from day-to-day office busywork to the occasional board meeting, but how...how can social media be integrated into a process to open a window to the world, whether it be telling a behind the scenes story, providing a space for conversation where there wasn't any before, or simply for the purpose of transparency in what makes art happen.

Translation - "a change to a different substance, form, or appearance"

When consulting on social media, one of my main takeaways I hope to leave people with is that, as much as possible, this should not be significantly more work than what you're doing already, like if you have a communications or marketing plan in place. My caveat is that using social media well is so much more than about marketing or communications, but more on that next time.

One example, we recently had an e-blast go out at my work at Class Acts Arts, for Black History Month, highlighting all of the artists on our roster with relevant programming. I "translated" that e-blast, into a series of shares one day, highlighting each of the artists we mentioned in the email, over the course of the afternoon.

Another example would be a show I just saw with another organization I'm involved with, and there were chapter/scene titles throughout the concert to help provide a loose narrative. Those prompts could have easily been used as conversation starters on social media leading up to the performance.

So it's taking copy/text and images you might already have and be using through other, more traditional media platforms, and figuring out how you might share it on Facebook, tweet it, etc.

Re-appropriation - "to set apart for or assign to a particular purpose or use, again"

So this is somewhat related to translation, but this speaks more to new opportunities, rather than existing ones. An example that comes to mind is another one with SpeakeasyDC and the wealth of videos from performances which we have up on our Vimeo channel.

A project I've taken upon is going through them and cataloging them according to various meta data, date(s) the stories took place, location, organizations mentioned, cultural references, etc., so that we might re-share them at appropriate moments. We had an LGBT pride-show, which speaks to those videos being reshared each pride month. If we have stories that relate to holidays, we can post them again leading up to those holidays.

So re-appropriating speaks to seeing how content you've created and have on hand, whether marketing, archival, whatever, can still be used in the future.

That's it!!

Let me know what you think in the comments,

JR

Saturday, February 16, 2013

Top Ten posts from the last year

Hey there,

It's almost spring cleaning time, and even though it's already the middle of February, I still feel like 2013 just got started. And after getting back from a one-week trip to Mexico (which I still need to finish uploading photos and videos from and top the mini-blog series off), which is the first time I really got to disconnect in a significant way from tech and social media, I've been in a somewhat reflective mood.

Reflective of life, the universe, everything (bonus points if you got the reference!!), and part of that has been trying to be more thoughtful about using the information I have at hand to inform the work I do.  I like data, and particularly with social media, want to better about using it to do more thoughtful work.

And at some point, it made me wonder with my own blog, what my most read posts have been. No, this doesn't mean that I'm going to stop writing about what I'm inspired to blog about. But at the same time, I want to make sure I learn what I can from what you all find more interesting and engaging than some of the other content I might share.

That being said, here are my top ten read posts from the past year (which is about when I began to endeavor blogging a bit more consistently).
  1. The Les Miserables Movie as Arts Advocacy
  2. What's hate got to do with it: Last week's FRC Shooting
  3. Being in a Greek chorus (I particularly love this one, because I'm in one again, in a production of Xanadu here in DC)
  4. Comparing 10 DC theatres on Twitter
  5. 15 minutes of fame & Trisha Paytas
  6. Ingress: Creating fields within fields (although this is actually dated; this no longer happens)
  7. "Success: It's not always what you see"
  8. 10 links and 10,000 tweets
  9. Why to only friend people you know on Facebook
  10. 10 things to know about the Niantic Project
So that's that. Just thought I'd share, in case there were any posts some of you might've been interested in, but hadn't seen yet.

But that just about seems to cover most of what I write about generally: the arts, social media, LGBT issues, and geeky things every now and then.

Now I'm wondering if I should do a post highlighting my least read posts...

- JR

Thursday, February 07, 2013

I've reached Twitter equilibrium

Hey there,

So I reached Twitter equilibrium today. It's been a long, journey, since my initial post last May about reaching my Twitter following limit. And now, my follower number equals my following number.

Now, just in case you were wondering, I am NOT a member of Team Follow Back. I do not indiscriminately follow anyone who follows me. And if they're not someone I want to follow back, for whatever reason, I actually block them.

Unless they're spammy, then I report them for spam. This speaks to me not wanting a large number of followers at the expense of some of them being fake. Actually blogged about follower fraud last August.

Yes, this does mean that I'm not getting as many followers as I could be, but quality is just as, if not even slightly more important, than quantity. I know, blocking people I don't want to follow back might seem harsh, but occasionally I still do list them, if they're sharing useful content related to any of my Twitter lists.

But it's because I want to be just as intentional with who follows me as with whom I follow. And, no, I'm not going to go through some of my criteria for this selection process because it's always evolving and exists on a case-by-case basis.

So today, for the first day since being on Twitter, not only do the number of people I'm following equal my followers, but they're the same people. It has been a process of letting go, unfollowing people who (for whatever reason) haven't followed me back. And as I mentioned before, lists (just one of ten twitter tips I recommend) helped with this, with Tweeps whom I still saw value in.

Because I'd rather list and unfollow someone who didn't reciprocate it, than follow them at the expense of being able to follow someone else. And you can check out Twitter's page on follow limits, in case you didn't know that they limit how many people you can follow, based on how many people are following you when you've followed 2,000 Tweeps.

Anyway, at the end of the day, this is a personal choice/preference to how I want to use Twitter well for me. For some, they don't want to follow more than 2,000 people, for others they have the starpower to only follow who they want and still rake in the followers. And it all comes down to personal goals and use of Twitter.

For my purposes, this how I need to go about using it well, to engage with relevant and quality people and content with the possibility of reciprocation. This is certainly not a template most would or should follow (haha no pun intended).

So that's that. Now to get back to my trip in Mazatlan, for Carnival!!

Let me know what you think, especially if you also reached your follower limit, and how you decided to go about managing it, to get more follows as well as to follow more people,

JR

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Social Media...it's not an age thing!!

Hey there,

So every now and then it comes up when talking about social media: generation generalizations, particularly the younger ones not being able to disconnect and the older ones not connecting at all.

Photo from Pew Internet report
on Older Adults and
Social Media
Which is where the impetus for this post is coming from. Because I was recently a part of a conversation in which a person older than me who doesn't personally use social media projected their own communication preferences among the rest of their age demographic.

Don't get me wrong, I'm sure that the perception is reinforced by their circle of friends. But to say that older people as a whole are not on social media, as if it were a fact...well...it ignores the facts.

Everything is relative, though. I'm sure part of the reinforcement is that compared to younger generations, older ones might not be on, in the same sheer quantities. But they've been catching up.

The Pew Internet and American Life Project has had a couple of relevant pieces in the past couple of years, one particularly looking at older adults and social networking.

In 2010, Mary Madden did an overview about their Older Adults and Social Media report. The overview begins with:
"While social media use has grown dramatically across all age groups, older users have been especially enthusiastic over the past year about embracing new networking tools. Social networking use among internet users ages 50 and older nearly doubled—from 22% in April 2009 to 42% in May 2010."
She even briefly mentioned Twitter:
"At the same time, the use of status update services like Twitter has also grown—particularly among those ages 50-64. One in ten internet users ages 50 and older now say they use Twitter or another service to share updates about themselves or see updates about others."
Again, might not be as much of a percentage as other age demographics, but the pattern of growth is certainly noteworthy. I highly recommend checking out the rest of the overview and the actual replort, even though 2010 seems like such a long time ago now. I especially recommend it if you like crunching numbers, and would like some to pull out the next time someone says that older people don't do social media.

She also gave a presentation in 2011 which is available at their website.

Just this past November, Joanna Brenner posted some commentary, Pew Internet: Social Networking (full detail).

While she provides a general overview, one graph that was particularly relevant was this.

That grey line (I'm sure it wasn't intentional) represents users age 65+ of social networks, which has been growing steadily over the past several years. The lighter blue line right above it is 50-64 year olds. Which has also been growing steadily, and then made a particularly noticeable jump in '12.

30-49 years olds have more or less leveled off. The 18-29 year olds had leveled off, and then jumped in '12, but being in the 90 percentile, there's only so much more room for growth.

All that being said, older people are clearly on social media in steadily increasing numbers, with almost 4 of 10 65+ year olds, and almost 6 out of 10 50-64 year olds.

So the next time you're having a discussion with someone of any age about older people not being on social media, you can better inform them.

Because it's not whether or not a particular demographic is on social media, whether it be age, race, etc., but it's about where they are and deciding to be there too.

You know, time, energy, money...resources in general, provided. Let me know what you think, if you've been a part of similar conversations, and what your own personal experiences have been,

- JR

Monday, January 21, 2013

Inauguration '13 Cheat Sheet...mostly on Twitter

So here's an Inauguration Cheat Sheet:

Bookmark #inauguration.

Follow:
Check out the join transportation plan, and here's the map if that's more your style.

What a pedestrian specific map? They've got it up at Google Docs.

Keep track of the convo with #Inaug2013



Have fun, be safe, stay warm, keep hydrated,

JR

Saturday, January 12, 2013

Looking for a Digital Media certificate program

Hey there,

So a couple of nights ago, I had dinner with the 'rents. I'm definitely grateful that I still live in the same city as them, and don't take the opportunity to see them as much as I want to and probably should. And yes, doing so is one of my New Year's resolutions.

And, don't get me wrong, I love them, but once we bring up work and careers, particularly my own, the inevitable happens: my dad informs me that I should be making more money. And I love my current place of employment and it pays adequately, but I also realize that with an M.A. in Arts Management from American University, I'm also at the lower end of the pay range for that degree.

I credit my dad's advice with maybe not knowing what the current job market is like as well as the fact that working for a non-profit does not mean we work for change. I mean, I was fortunate to get a job right out of grad school, with the position offered to me before the interview was over. And the organization regularly communicates how much my effort is appreciated and valued.

But I digress. Part of what my dad did put out there which struck a chord, was taking a look at technical certificate programs. He went on to talk about how good I am with computers, and how I could earn extra and maybe even more money doing additional contract work. I wanted to remind him, that's kind of been my plan with social media and that I've already started doing that, both paid and pro bono.

So, even though it wasn't what he had in mind, I'm sure, I decided to google "social media certification". This was where my search started.

And the first result to pop up for me was an article at Social Media Today from 2011, The "Social Media Certificate" - Smart Move or Scam? by Tom Pick. From the get-go, he has no qualms about letting know exactly what his answer to his question is:
A growing number of community colleges, vocational schools, online universities, technical colleges and even big-name universities are now offering social media certificate programs (Google this if you like, I don’t want to legitimize any of them with a link). It’s understandable why the purveyors offer them—unemployment is high, social media is a hot topic, the federal government is still willing to spend our great-great-grandchildren’s future taxes on questionable education grants today—but are such programs really a good idea for students? When companies hire, does having a social media certificate really differentiate a job candidate?
In the piece, viewing social media as a tool, he compares having a social media certificate to having an Excel certificate, and...well I'm sure you get the idea.

Regardless, this didn't discourage my search, but actually energized it. As he seemed to draw comments from mostly like-minded folk, one person wrote:
"Well I think the idea of social media certification itself is absurd. Its funny how people think that they need to be certified in everything in order to prove their skills. It really is like being a certified artist or musician. I don’t need to be certified to prove I know how to rock."
I'm guessing this person missed the memo that the Arts are legitimate majors, and require skills and techniques that can be learned and refined, regardless of innate talent. And then the light bulb came on. Different people have different views of the value of education. For these people, the paper (certificate, diploma, whatever) isn't worth the time or money. They'll figure it out on their own, which is fine and valid, don't get me wrong. I suppose it's a matter of personal preference and learning styles.

But for me, the value isn't in what you get at the end, it's the process. It's the curriculum. It's the opportunity to discuss relevant subjects in a safe setting without real consequences (other than your grade), and to receive information and context from peers and professionals that have probably put much more thought and energy into the value and structure of a social media program than the author of the piece above.

So, you've probably guessed, I'm one of those people that appreciates learning in the Ivory Tower. I wouldn't be where I am now, as soon as I am, if I didn't have the knowledge and generate the appropriate critical thinking skills and vocabulary for the nonprofit arts sector, that I do from AU's program. Sure, I would've learned it all in time, and I suppose in the end it will always cost time or money.

Back to the certificate search. I must add, one other reason this is appealing to me is because with a couple of recent job applications, I personally know that having a certificate like this on my resume, could only help position me above other candidates that don't. All things being equal, that's generally the way it works. Unless a company or organization doesn't see value in that, so I suppose it ultimately depends on its culture.

I go further with the results, and see that HootSuite has an online University which provides its own certification upon completion. Now I'm not sure how long HootSuite U has been available, but I can see some of where the sentiment might come from, in terms of looking at social media certification warily. But I also see the value in Hootsuite U, and might enroll myself. I appreciate knowledge, and I don't think the majority of people who set up programs like this are doing it just to make a quick buck.

But then I come across AU's Digital Media Skills Online Certification. Not only is this a program at my alma mater, but it's online!! I took note of that, but also revised my search to "digital media certification". This provided another local program in the first page of results, Georgetown University's Certificate in Digital Media Management.

I look to see if there are any other local universities offering digital media certificate programs, but those seem like the only ones, and they're both appealing choices for different reasons. AU's is online, only requires 5 courses, and seems geared towards skills. Georgetown's is in person, requires 7 courses, and seems focused on strategy and implementation.

If could do both I would, but for now time to go back to the 'rents and talk them through this and see what they think. And that's mostly just so I can have an excuse to go back and have dinner with them.

What do you think about digital and/or social media certificate or degree programs? Do you agree with Tom in his piece? Does it depend? Do you have a certificate yourself, and how has it served you, or not?

Please let me know in the comments. And I'll keep you updated about this next chapter in my professional development,

- JR